Toilette im Flugzeug: Abwässer werden nach Bedarf abgepumpt.

BacteriaHow aircraft toilets worsen antibiotics resistances

Pathogens against which no antibiotic is effective are an increasing danger. The washrooms on airplanes may be contributing to the spread of these pathogens.

Top-Jobs

sunny cars

Customer Service Expert (m/w/d)

München / Remote
Feste Anstellung
Autovermietung
Sunny Cars
Deutschland
30 - 40 Stunden
Top jobs
IFFD Flugdienste

Piloten/ First Officer (m/w/d)

IFFD GmbH
Graz/Klagenfurt
Feste Anstellung
NCC-Betrieb
Österreich
Vollzeit
Top jobs
Sparfell Logo

Flight Operations Officer in Vienna (Austria)

Vienna
Feste Anstellung
Business Aviation
SPARFELL Luftfahrt GmbH
Österreich
Vollzeit
Top jobs

Never before has the threat of resistance to antibiotics been more immediate and the need for solutions more urgent, the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) recently warned. Too few new antibiotics are coming to market to prevent this problem, according to General Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. And aviation ist partly to blame.

A recent study suggests that sewage from aircraft toilets contributes to the threat. Researchers from various German and international universities took samples at five German airports. The study does not mention the names of the airports. However, on the basis of the passenger figures mentioned, it is clear that the three largest airports Frankfurt, Munich and Düsseldorf were among them.

90 percent of bacteria resistant

The samples were taken from the vehicles into which aircraft wastewater is pumped. «Since the aircraft tanks are only emptied when necessary, each contains wastewater from several flights,» the study states. The scientists examined the samples for antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistant genes. For comparison, they used corresponding values from German sewage plants with and without airport connections. The result: on average, the samples from the airplanes contained significantly more and also more diverse resistances.

Two particularly clear examples: Almost 90 percent of the E. coli bacteria from the planes were resistant to at least one of the antibiotics tested. In the municipal sewage plants, the values were only between 45 and 60 percent. The proportion of multiple resistances to three or more antibiotics was also considerably higher than the comparative values. In a certain combination, the value from aircraft wastewater even exceeded the value from German hospitals several times over.

Wastewater tanks need to be better researched

As a plausible explanation for the results, the study cites the mixing of intestinal bacteria of people from different regions of the world, which takes place through the aircraft sewage. However, the authors stress that other factors could also be decisive, but these have not yet been researched. For example, it is conceivable that certain disinfectants that are often used in aircraft wastewater tanks could create an environment that favours the development of certain resistances.

The scientists conclude: «Our results suggest that wastewater from aircraft can effectively contribute to the rapid and global spread of antibiotic resistance.» They further write that although the aircraft sewage is mixed with other sewage and thus virtually diluted.

Treat wastewater first, then mix it

However, even the smallest amount of resistance genes in the water cycle could become dangerous. From this point of view, it is not so much the high number of resistance genes that is problematic, but rather the fact that genes are imported from the other end of the world into a local ecosystem, where they are hardly ever found. The same applies to multiple resistances to several antibiotics.

As a consequence of their findings, the scientists make two suggestions. Firstly, they recommend researching the processes in the wastewater tanks. On the other hand, they recommend pre-treating airport wastewater to combat resistance before it is mixed with municipal wastewater. Given the comparatively small volume, this is probably cheaper and more effective than dealing with the problem later.

No immediate health hazard

The researchers in this study did not concern themselves with germs in the toilets of airplanes. For passengers, the findings on resistance do not pose an immediate health hazard - unless, perhaps, someone reaches directly into the toilet, which would be a bad idea everywhere.

Mehr zum Thema

Deutsche Flughäfen für Coronavirus gerüstet

Deutsche Flughäfen für Coronavirus gerüstet

...hieß die Erfindung mal Germ Falcon.

Mit Licht und Lack gegen Keime

Escherichia coli: Die Bakterien können überall lauern.

Bakterien reisen lange mit

Video

König Willem-Alexander bei seinem letzten Flug mit einer Boeing 737: Er lässt sich nochmals umschulen.
Fußballfans, Familien auf dem Weg nach Lappland oder Urlauber nach Ibiza: Viele Passagiere ahnten nicht, dass ihr Kopilot der König der Niederlande war. Jetzt flog Willem-Alexander letztmals mit einer Boeing 737 von KLM - und beginnt nun die Umschulung auf Airbus.
Stefan Eiselin
Stefan Eiselin
amboseli airstrip under water
Ein Video aus dem Amboseli-Nationalpark in Kenia scheint einen See zu zeigen. Aber nein: Es ist die Start- und Landebahn des Park-Airports. Sie ist vollständig im Wasser verschwunden.
Timo Nowack
Timo Nowack
air canada bridgetown umkehr
Am Flughafen Bridgetown ging auf einmal gar nichts mehr. Flüge von Air Canada und Jetblue mussten auf dem Weg zum internationalen Flughafen von Barbados plötzlich umkehren. Grund war ein spontaner Streik.
Timo Nowack
Timo Nowack